Skip to main content

A Country Founded on Equality

Imagine a country founded on equality. We shall call it Harkland. Imagine that Harkland believed that equality was the supreme good under which all other virtues were secondary. However, the people of this country weren't entirely sure what equality meant. Did it mean sameness? Treating everyone as if they were one? Did it mean ensuring that everyone got the same thing? They weren't sure.

So the people of Harkland decided it must mean that everyone ought to be given equal opportunity to achieve what they wished regardless of the "appropriateness" or "sensibility" or "goodness" of their desires. So long as nobody's achievements took away from another's achievements anything was allowed. The citizens in Harkland protected their right of originality with a fervor that bordered on paranoia. Entire careers were built on the defense of originality, experimentation without repercussions, and the proving that individuals or business were operating under the law of equality.

It was also decided that equality meant that everyone ought to be within a particular economic range. If the majority of people had too much than everyone ought to have too much. Those who had little or enough were patronized by those who had too much until the Enougher's were Too-Muchers as well. This patronization was extended to other countries as well. 

Lastly, the Harklanders decided that equality must mean that everyone's beliefs were equally true and thus equally honorable. One god could not be more right or more good or just than another. One set of religious values could not be more true than another's, except in proportion to how well they adhered to the law of equality. Thus, those who proved that they were treating others the most equal were considered the most upright. And those who were discovered to have broken the law of equality were the county's worst villains, persecuted and imprisoned, ridiculed and defamed unlike any other lawbreaker. Womanizers, slave owners, and bigots were thus at the very bottom of the barrel.

After the country worked out the definition of equality, it did a lot of good. It shared its wealth with other countries, provided safety and security for the down and out, and fought for the rights of the under-privileged. After it accomplished such goods, it continued a kind of witch-hunt on anything that smelled remotely like inequality. And because the other virtues (justice, mercy, goodness, self-control, peace etc.) were secondary, equality became a sort of god to Harkland, a prison in-fact, that prevented them from flourishing or thriving.

Eventually Harkland, like all nations founded on an ideal, collapsed. Its people's hearts were so fixated on equality that they could not give the other virtues their just due. Nations will continue to rise and fall unless rulers learn how to use each virtue at its appropriate time. And no one can do this without an omniscient, omnipotent guide.

*This is not a parallel to America. The US is far more complex than this. And I don't think the US has entirely succeeded at obtaining equality. There are, however, many similarities.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Eyes Up. Head Down.

Nose to the grindstone. Eyes on the task at hand. Administer consequences. Hold. Comfort. Listen. Teach. What if I was too harsh? What if I was too lenient? What if I ruined them? What if I repeat history? Eyes up. Up ahead. See the net of God's grace All around you, inside and out. The net to catch me, The net to catch them, Made by faith  Not my efforts But what Christ has done. Back to the grind. Stay afloat. Achieve success. Schedule. Budget. Economize. Write lists. Clean. Return calls. Catch my breath with other moms  And suddenly see a difference. One mom prays over her four each night. Another is outrageously spontaneous. That one's house is disgustingly tidy. And that one has published a book. I'm quite sure I'm not enough Not nearly as glorious or good. Head down. Eyes on my own hands. What is it to me If they march to a different beat? I must follow Christ. Nose to the grindstone To God's task for me here, And praise him who doesn't repeat. Back to jug

Baptism Testimony

I didn't used to want to be baptized. I was too stubborn. I was determined to be the upright, genuine Christian who wasn't baptized—something of a superior class, I suppose. All that physical symbolism was for the archaic layman or the really emotional sort or the person who's afraid baptism is necessary for salvation. It's not for me. It's not for the steady, reliable believer who's doesn't have a big conversion story. I was in preschool when I prayed the prayer. In 6th grade, I gained a deeper understanding of sin while bickering with my siblings in the backseat of the family van. When I was 16, I began a daily quiet time with the Lord. And now at 36, I'm hearing the Lord asking me to make my faith work. Make the rubber meet the road. Get out of "morbid introspection and into deeds," out of "anxious hesitation and into the storm of events" (Rohr & Ebert, 129-130). Stop retreating into my head to figure out God and salvation

Wanting the Ends Without the Means

I want my children to learn to get along, But I don't want to work with them through their fights. I want them to feel and understand their emotions, But I don't want them to slam doors or cry for too long. I want them to be respectful to adults, But I don't want to be embarrassed when they're learning. I want them to choose to obey, But I don't want to come up with consequences when they don't. I want them to creatively fill their own time, But I don't want to clean up the mess when they put stickers on the walls or throw tomatoes over the neighbor's fence or cut through the upholstery with scissors. I want them to be good. But I don't want to suffer through their becoming good I want a rich and seasoned relationship with my husband, But I don't want to endure seasons of dryness or coldness or disinterestedness. I want to have friends who are different than me, But I don't want to hear their threatening opinions. I want to have mutually supp